IMA ASIA

Author name: AliceTongBOD

Asia Bulletins, Asia Pacific, Geopolitics

War rooms and Safe havens

War rooms and Safe havens April 21, 2026 Supply strains emerge: daily war rooms and tough trade-offs   What’s new: Asia CEOs are seeing the impact of the war in Iran on their supply chains, with tighter feedstock supplies, rising logistics costs, and longer lead times. The effects remain uneven across sectors and geographies, but early stress points are forcing uncomfortable decisions. Leaders are moving from strategic planning to triage, from price risk to availability risk. There’s a war room every day with my leadership team to make decisions on everything from rerouting supplies to raising prices with customers. Never a dull moment.’ (science-based service provider) Supply chain resiliency is the key question in this very uncertain world. This is my biggest concern right now, which is keeping me up at night. (global manufacturer with assembly in the US) Here’s what Asia CEOs and managers are saying. Feedstock gaps are emerging, sometimes in unexpected places. Customers are cutting operations because they are running out of feedstock. Packaging suppliers sent us force majeure letters because the petroleum-derived raw materials, or resin feedstocks, are not reaching the region. We have a vast supply chain network with redundancy capability, but packaging is not viable if it must be air freighted. Air cargo prices are through the roof. In a few weeks, we could run out of some plastic jug SKUs. We are having to increase prices. Inflation hit us hard on transportation costs, and now it’s impacting raw materials. We are in crisis mode. Scarcity is forcing tough trade-offs on the factory floor and with customers. In chemicals and plastics, the past month has been chaotic. Energy prices matter, but the bigger issue is feedstocks. Crude and gas are refined into inputs for chemicals and plastics. Across the region, supply is disrupted. Key inputs like naphtha and LPG are in short supply. Producers in Korea, Japan, and Taiwan are scrambling — deciding how hard to run plants, how long inventory will last, and prioritising customers who can pay higher prices. Planning has become extremely difficult. Running plants too low is inefficient and costly; running them too high, burns through feedstock too fast. Both carry risks, including equipment damage. So, it’s constant trade-offs, every day. Energy exposure varies significantly by country and needs to be assessed… We are going country by country to understand how much energy is coming from the Middle East or elsewhere. Our team has been doing a deep dive to educate ourselves. Our Vietnam country head said energy costs rose by 50% in February due to energy shortages. Hydro and coal are the main energy sources; gas accounts for only 10%. While Malaysia is more stable. High fuel costs limit the mobility of employees and goods. So many Asian countries are energy dependent and people can’t afford the high prices. This makes it hard for employees in outsourced business functions, such as HR or finance, to get to work when fuel costs are so high. In Sri Lanka, companies are letting employees work from home or arranging busing to get them to the office. We are absorbing material costs for now, but logistics costs have gone through the roof. At the end of the day, we must deliver the P&L. We are discussing price increases with customers. Air freight has become an expensive stopgap for some. I advise a British company with a large factory in Dubai that supplies India and parts of the Middle East. We are using air freight from the UK to keep supplying our Indian customers while Middle East sales are down by 50%. But thankfully, customers in the Gulf are still discussing future orders, so there is still a pipeline. China’s energy mix offers a temporary buffer. We have huge supply chain issues in India. Our powder-coat facilities require large amounts of gas to bake the paint. We are considering temporarily switching production back to China to avoid disrupting the customer experience, but this will have significant import tax implications. We are eating all the costs for now, but I don’t know how long we can do that for. Coal-based chemical production has kept running in China…despite the push towards renewables. Energy is where China stands out. There was a lot of talk about China moving away from coal toward solar, wind, and hydrogen. But in the chemical industry, China maintained coal-based production. Coal prices have barely moved, and coal-to-chemicals is running very well. China’s oil demand was expected to decline as EVs and renewables grew, yet it continued to stockpile oil. Looking back, their strategy is vindicated. What’s next: keeping an eye on other vital maritime chokepoints. Members raised concerns about the Taiwan Strait, the Panama Canal, and the Suez Canal. Panama has taken steps affecting CK Hutchison’s port concessions, further straining relations with China. While in Egypt, China has invested substantially in the Suez Canal. Ships are avoiding the Suez Canal because of higher insurance premiums and other risks. They are going around the southern tip of Africa, causing delays of 10 to 18 days for shipments to Southeast Asia coming from Europe and the US East Coast. We are also aware of the strategic presence of Chinese investment in that part of the world and in the Panama Canal, which creates some uncertainty. Bottom line: The Strait of Hormuz disruption is still working its way through the system, and the impact is uneven. But as buffers erode, more sectors are likely to face the same trade-offs caused by price volatility and availability risk. Silver Linings and Safe Havens   What’s new: Cancelled flights to the Middle East (and more recently China), along with rising fuel costs, are disrupting long-haul travel and compressing airline margins.   On the ground, however, more than one Asia CEO shared their experiences of packed regional hubs. There are media reports that taxis stopped running to the Bangkok airport because of fuel prices but that seems overstated. I was just in Bangkok, the airport was jam-packed, same as

China, Strategy

2026 Q2 China Performance Survey

2026 Q2 China Performance Survey April 14, 2026 China’s business environment is shifting. We asked CEOs and leaders in our China Performance survey to find out how their businesses are changing. Here are the key takeaways from the survey: 2025 budget – bottoms up vs. the top. 60%+ met their bottom-line target (whether margin % or dollar value); but the market is still soft with just 54% meeting sales targets. Iran War hits profitability, but market pricing starts to recover. Geopolitical issues (32%-50%), rising input costs (23%-33%), and shipping delays (8%-22%) rose sharply as high impact factors affecting profitability in Q1’26. Q1’26 is the first quarter in two years with more firms seeing stable or rising prices than falling prices. Stronger expectations for Q2’26. 87% expect steady or improved sales growth; strongest growth expectations since Q2’24. 77% expect profits (% revenue) to remain steady or improve 79% expect profits (USD value) to remain steady or improve Interested in accessing the full survey results or joining the conversation? Enter your details below or email service@imaasia.com.cn. Download the full survey report: Gated download – China Performance Survey 2026 Q2 NameEmailCheckbox Field By entering your name and email, you’re opting into our mailing list and agreeing to receive updates and communications from us.Submit Deepen your understanding & explore the implications for business and strategy in our latest Asia Brief. Log In to access our latest reports. LOG IN Not yet a member?Contact us to learn more. You might also find these insights valuable Asean Asia Bulletins Asia Pacific China China Bulletins Exchange Rates Forecast Geopolitics Japan Leadership Market Strategy Team-Building 2026 Q2 China Performance Survey April 14, 2026/No Comments 2026 Q2 China Performance Survey April 14, 2026 China’s business environment is shifting. We asked CEOs and leaders in our… Read More Beyond oil: the blocked Gulf inputs that hurt Asia the most April 8, 2026/No Comments Beyond oil: the blocked Gulf inputs that hurt Asia the most April 14, 2026 Since the Strait of Hormuz closed,… Read More Asian Logistics Hubs: The cost-reliability trade-off January 13, 2026/ Asian Logistics Hubs: The cost-reliability trade-off January 20, 2026 In this issue of our Asia Bulletin, we hear from Asia’s… Read More Load More End of Content.

Asia Bulletins, Asia Pacific, Geopolitics

Beyond oil: the blocked Gulf inputs that hurt Asia the most

Beyond oil: the blocked Gulf inputs that hurt Asia the most April 14, 2026 Since the Strait of Hormuz closed, oil and LNG prices have dominated the headlines. But as the war continues, the story that will define the next six to twelve months is the rising prices of everything else stuck in the Gulf. The Asia Bulletin reflects insights from IMA’s peer forums for CEOs and senior leaders. It highlights anonymised perspectives that surface the issues executives are grappling with firsthand. Reach out to us if you’re interested in the full report. It turns out that the Strait is a critical chokepoint for far more than oil.   For example, the Gulf is a major supplier of fertiliser inputs (e.g., urea) and helium to Asia. As these become scarcer, the prices of food and semiconductor chips will skyrocket. In late March, IMA Asia invited Nenad Pacek, founder of the EMEA Business Group and a 35-year veteran of Middle East business intelligence, to share his expertise with our members. The second-order supply shocks building behind the scenes were discussed. Even if the Strait were to reopen in the coming days or weeks, stockpiles of critical inputs are rapidly depleting, and damaged production sites across the Gulf will take time to repair. The impact across Asia will vary by industry and degree of dependence, but long-tail inflationary effects are to be expected. There appears to be no quick fix. Even in the base case of the war ending in the next month or so, Pacek advised: The clearance of the logjam and backlogs will take a while… our shipping clients believe this could linger into late Q2 or later. Below is a sample of the shortages to watch out for, along with a checklist to help Asia CEOs take action. The chips and electronics industries face helium and bromine shortages Helium is a big ingredient for the semiconductor industry. About 30% of the global supply comes from the region, mainly Qatar. Now it’s completely disrupted as well. Helium: Operations at QatarEnergy’s Ras Laffan Industrial City, the world’s largest LNG export facility, which produces helium as a byproduct, were halted after it was struck by an Iranian drone early in the war. Iranian missiles subsequently crippled the plant further. Spot helium prices have since doubled. For Asia’s chipmakers, the exposure is acute as stockpiles deplete. South Korea and Taiwan source more than 60% of their helium from Qatar, leaving them highly exposed. Japan has a more diversified supply base, sourcing only 30% of its helium from the Gulf. Bromine: used in precision chip etching and as a flame retardant in circuit boards, is also putting Korea’s electronics industry at risk. It is a quiet chokepoint that gets little media coverage but has a high concentration risk. Around two-thirds of the world’s bromine production comes from Israel and Jordan (from the Dead Sea), but Korea relies on Israel for most of its supply. The food and ag industries face fertiliser shortages (lacking inputs like urea, sulphur, etc.) as the planting season looms About 35% of the world’s fertiliser imports come from the Gulf. And about a third of the world’s urea passes through the Strait of Hormuz. The price of fertiliser has skyrocketed as shortages mount. The timing could not be worse for countries like India, with planting season on the way. India has an 800,000-ton deficit in its monthly urea production of 2.6 million tons due to limiting industrial gas supply to the 70–75% range. Furthermore, disruptions to ammonia imports have brought local production to a standstill, as the country sources 80% of its ammonia needs from the Gulf region. India is turning to Chinafor assistance. Australiaexpects current stocks to run out by mid-April, as it sources over 60% of its urea from the Middle East. A domino effect… Strait closure leads to shortages of urea and sulphur, which in turn cause shortages of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers. Down the road, this could lead to lower crop yields, food price inflation, and potentially political instability. …on time delay. Experts expect inflation to spike mid- to late Q2 if the war extends. Food inflation will lag behind fertiliser price rises by three to six months, meaning H2 2026 is the key window to watch for food price cascades in Asia. Manufacturers face shortages in petrochemicals and aluminium A lot of the world’s supply chains — whether it’s the car industry, heavy industry, or plastics — depend on critical petrochemical components from the Gulf. And a lot of that is just simply not leaving. Petrochemical shortages are the hardest to quantify but could potentially result in the broadest shock. The Gulf’s SABIC, BOROUGE, QAPCO, and affiliates produce ethylene, propylene, polyethylene, methanol, and hundreds of downstream derivatives used globally in electronics, packaging, automotive, and pharma applications. For aluminium, it goes beyond logistics headaches. Iran has targeted the region’s major aluminium plants with missiles and drones. Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain are all stuck. All the aluminium exports from Bahrain are stuck, which has a global impact on top of everything else. The Middle East supplies 9% of the world’s aluminium, and Bahrain accounts for 3%. Aluminium prices hit a four-year high in March, with some suggesting they could reach $4,000 per ton if the industry faces severe disruption. One caveat: Chinese-invested aluminium plants in Indonesia are expected to ramp up production this year. A global logistics logjam — ships and containers stuck in the Gulf Ships and containers unable to offload their cargo remain in the Gulf, tying up shipping capacity needed elsewhere and driving prices higher. Hundreds of thousands of containers —up to 2 million TEU of cargo once downstream disruption is considered — are caught in the Gulf. That’s a global shipping disruption because those containers cannot be in Asian ports, the Port of Los Angeles or Rotterdam. So it’s already significantly increasing global shipping costs. The routing problem is not easily fixed – there are few port alternatives to the Strait in

Uncategorized

Upcoming event: Is Hong Kong back?

Upcoming event: Is Hong Kong back? March 19, 2026 Is Hong Kong Back? Hong Kong’s market took a tumble over the last six years. Companies pulled out, tourism stalled, home prices collapsed, and residents and expats left. However, a finance sector boom over the last year, led by IPOs by mainland firms, suggests that at least one of the city’s key engines is firing again. Whether the recovery can broaden into other sectors is the focus of our April 10 Zoom session for the Asia CEO Forum. Mark Michelson, IMA’s longtime Hong Kong chair, will guide the conversation and draw insights from experts and forum members. If you’re reconsidering Hong Kong for your Asia operations, this session clarifies what’s real and what’s hype. If you’ve written off the city, you may be missing an inflection point. Either way, peer perspectives from leaders navigating this decision now matter. This is an opportunity to discover whether senior executives have changed their thinking on Hong Kong. Interested in joining the session? Send us a message or email service@imaasia.com to reserve a spot. The April 10 Zoom call will be from 8.00am to 9.15am.  Contact service@imaasia.com to join the session. Deepen your understanding & explore the implications for business and strategy in our latest Asia Brief. Log In to access our latest reports. LOG IN Not yet a member?Contact us to learn more. You might also find these insights valuable Asean Asia Bulletins Asia Pacific China China Bulletins Exchange Rates Forecast Geopolitics Japan Leadership Market Strategy Team-Building Asian Logistics Hubs: The cost-reliability trade-off January 13, 2026/ Asian Logistics Hubs: The cost-reliability trade-off January 20, 2026 In this issue of our Asia Bulletin, we hear from Asia’s… Read More China as an engine of global change December 5, 2025/ China as an engine of global change January 20, 2026 China’s place in global business is shifting, and China CEOs… Read More Hong Kong: Comeback or Decline? May 20, 2025/ Hong Kong: Comeback or Decline? May 20, 2025 Hong Kong’s new National Security Law has raised fears that the city… Read More Load More End of Content.

China, China Bulletins

China as an engine of global change

China as an engine of global change January 20, 2026 China’s place in global business is shifting, and China CEOs are navigating tougher questions from boards and C-suites. Recent discussions in the China CEO Forum surfaced the themes and pressure points that matter most right now.   Building on those conversations, we have shaped a framework for understanding China’s role in today’s global economy. This series shares those insights to support your strategy discussions with HQ.   The China Bulletin reflects our peer forums in Shanghai for China CEOs, senior leaders, and advisors. We share direct quotes from our members to surface the issues executives are wrestling with firsthand. What’s new: Chinese competition is coming to a market near you and, in the process, redrawing the industrial map.   China’s offshoring represents a generational structural shift, driven by deeper forces than a simple one-off. CEOs and experts shared their views on why this time is different. Many Chinese companies now, compared to eight years ago, have become more confident about themselves compared to Western firms. That confidence matters. What’s happening in the US — the policies coming out of Washington, DC — is, on balance, helping Chinese firms feel more comfortable that this is a good time to go out. There’s a push factor: major overcapacity and relentless competition inside China, which is driving down profit margins and increasing motivation to expand abroad. Why it matters: Chinese firms are moving from suppliers to partners or fierce competitors — and this is changing how MNCs operate and nations regulate.   As Chinese firms move upstream and expand globally, MNCs will need to rethink how they manage partnerships, supply chains, technology, and standards. State of play: Europe demonstrates China’s preference for incremental entry— acquiring niche firms that unlock technical know-how or local certifications — often under the radar. Chinese firms are quietly buying up small and mid-sized European suppliers across Italy, Spain, Austria, and Germany. These are modest but strategically meaningful transactions. Chinese players gain a foothold inside Europe’s value and supply chains. Larger deals are emerging too, driven by Europe’s growing pool of distressed assets — many weakened by Chinese competition itself. This isn’t necessarily the result of a grand industrial strategy, but a byproduct. In some cases, MNCs welcome these tie-ups, impressed by Chinese innovation. But they must face investment screenings first. ICYMI: In case you missed it, Hungary is worth watching. It receives the largest share of Chinese FDI in Europe. Chinese automotive and battery firms, including BYD and CATL, are moving production to Europe — mainly Hungary — drawn by pro-investment policies and government backing. Investments are clustering on Europe’s fringes — Hungary, Greece. If this continues, Hungary could shift from Europe’s “bad boy” to a manufacturing powerhouse with China inside. The play: MNCs that partner with Chinese firms as they establish their presence abroad can stay ahead of the curve.   Many Chinese firms, whether private or state-owned, will struggle abroad as they face fresh challenges. Some won’t succeed — and some will benefit from partnerships. There could be more cooperation between Chinese and European companies, because, frankly, most Chinese firms are poorly equipped to scale in Europe. They lack distribution networks, an understanding of the service levels expected in Europe, and proper quality assurance — not quality itself, but the assurance processes. They’re also missing local content. These gaps will close with greenfield investment, but only if the broader framework conditions in Europe stabilise. The twist. Roles have reversed. Chinese firms entering new markets now face the same challenges MNCs once faced in China. The irony is striking: European firms may play the same role for Chinese companies in Europe that Chinese partners once played for them in China — offering market access, distribution networks, and credibility through voluntary joint ventures or even full mergers. The balance of who needs whom is shifting. Chinese firms are utilising Europe to build capacity. This is the mirror image of how MNCs once entered China. Buying SMEs for certifications and processes. Building service, distribution, and QA capabilities that they don’t yet have. Starting in fringe markets to learn in a lower-risk setting. Yes, but while there are parallels between how Chinese and Western firms globalise, there are also striking differences — which could trigger further disruptions. Operational blind spots: Chinese firms’ domestic instincts do not always translate abroad. In China, companies practise stakeholder management every day. When times are tough, they don’t downsize. Yet once they cross the border, that instinct seems to vanish. One advisor points out that private firms and even provincial SOEs are more commercially than ideologically driven; however, many Chinese leaders have never navigated a Western-style recession. Their default response is expansion, not restructuring. Their instinctive response is to focus on top-line growth — investing, expanding, and chasing new markets — rather than cutting costs. It’s not ideology; it’s muscle memory. Adaptation takes time, another CEO reminded. When Japanese giants first expanded overseas, they struggled with labour, tax, and environmental standards. Within 10–15 years, they learned. Chinese firms will need the same period. Geopolitical blind spots: China’s commercial ties with Russia and its use of export licensing (such as rare earths) keep Europe wary and could harden screening regimes if a line is crossed. State-owned enterprises are cautious not to appear supportive of Russia, but Chinese banks remain under close scrutiny. Europe’s dependencies have become chokepoints. The EU has realised how exposed it is in critical sectors and how easily these can be weaponised. Dependencies are becoming liabilities. But China cannot replace the US in Europe’s strategic calculus. The US is the main destination for EU FDI — more than a quarter of total investment. China accounts for just 2.5%. Between 30% and 50% of Europe’s imported defence systems are sourced from the US. Big picture: Trade talks between China and the EU have narrowed. Comprehensive China–EU agreements are off the table.   The future of trade talks with China is likely to involve sectoral

Scroll to Top